Ecuadorian vs Thai Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Thai
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Thais

Poor
Exceptional
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Thai Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,092,997 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Thais within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Thais.
Ecuadorian Integration in Thai Communities

Ecuadorian vs Thai Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $72,135, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $129,560, a difference of 38.2%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $131,281, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $59,187, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $47,577, a difference of 21.6%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $54,307, a difference of 29.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Income
Income MetricEcuadorianThai
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$54,307
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$131,281
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$110,648
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$59,237
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$72,135
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$47,577
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$59,187
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$121,778
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$129,560
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$72,099
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
30.5%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 83.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 66.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianThai
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
17.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
24.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
8.1%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianThai
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianThai
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
84.3%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 38.5%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.0%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianThai
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
30.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
51.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
50.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
24.0%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 178.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 41.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 17.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianThai
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
6.2%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.5%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianThai
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
89.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
73.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
68.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
57.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
50.1%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Ecuadorian vs Thai Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Thai Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianThai
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%