Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
White/Caucasian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Whites/Caucasians

Poor
Average
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

White/Caucasian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,868,656 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.197% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 197.2 Whites/Caucasians.
Ecuadorian Integration in White/Caucasian Communities

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,336, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $58,847, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,197, a difference of 0.040%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $82,029, a difference of 0.050%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $91,668, a difference of 0.10%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Income
Income MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Poor
$42,180
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Poor
$99,800
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Poor
$82,029
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Poor
$45,197
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Fair
$53,925
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$37,531
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Tragic
$50,336
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Poor
$91,668
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Fair
$98,091
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$58,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
28.5%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.1%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.9%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.8%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Poor
33.3%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 223.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 64.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.7%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
60.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.31%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Poor
64.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
57.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
44.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
35.3%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.070%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs White/Caucasian Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianWhite/Caucasian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%