Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Ghanaians

Poor
Fair
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,232,560 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 29.7 Ghanaians.
Ecuadorian Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $60,043, a difference of 9.2%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $98,877, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $97,277, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,958 compared to $42,164, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $90,137, a difference of 1.6%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $83,582, a difference of 1.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
22.3%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.0%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.90%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Good
83.0%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.0%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.96%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
34.3%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.7%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.32%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%