Ecuadorian vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,032,745 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $38,442, a difference of 9.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $58,761, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $49,458, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $91,498, a difference of 0.080%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $82,410, a difference of 0.41%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $93,355, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.7%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (43.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.42, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 207.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 95.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 77.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.7%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (91.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (89.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%).