Ecuadorian vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,427,053 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $60,608, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,447, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $92,241, a difference of 0.73%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,732, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $83,193, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.46%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.3%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 181.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 18.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 54.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.47%).