Ecuadorian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,454,292 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $74,847, a difference of 22.4%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $67,715, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $45,371, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $51,949, a difference of 5.8%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $46,594, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $39,648, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 192.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 55.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 80.3%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 74.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 58.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.0%).