Ecuadorian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,165,526 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.7%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $106,183, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $60,967, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,891, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $86,418, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,640, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 67.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 44.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 324.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 86.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.95%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%).