Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Kenyan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Kenyans
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,922
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
135th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Kenyan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,084,043 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Kenyans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Kenyans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Kenyans.
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $60,514, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $101,417, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $91,684, a difference of 0.12%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,860, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $42,808, a difference of 2.0%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Fair $42,808 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Fair $101,417 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Fair $84,085 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Average $46,462 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Fair $53,647 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Average $39,860 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Tragic $50,815 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Poor $91,684 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Fair $98,970 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Fair $60,514 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 24.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 36.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Fair 17.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Good 11.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 67.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 40.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 44.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 45.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Average 31.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 134.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 15.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 6.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.96%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Excellent 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Excellent 66.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Good 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Good 47.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Good 38.7% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Kenyan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.49%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Kenyan |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Poor 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |