Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Yugoslavians

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,799,244 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Yugoslavians.
Ecuadorian Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $58,243, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,028, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,070 compared to $82,186, a difference of 0.14%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $91,368, a difference of 0.23%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,846, a difference of 1.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
26.7%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.7%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 31.5%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 33.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.82%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Good
83.0%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.2%), currently married (43.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Good
30.8%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 153.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Average
6.3%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianYugoslavian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%