Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,556,449 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $51,770, a difference of 23.4%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $116,165, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $66,376, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.82%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $43,571, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $52,361, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 54.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 42.0%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.11%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.7%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.14, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 93.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.1%).