Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Norway

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Norway Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,579,629 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 22.0 Immigrants from Norway.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $52,217, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $115,847, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $66,118, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,984, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,837, a difference of 9.5%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $51,758, a difference of 14.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$52,217
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$115,847
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$94,846
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$51,758
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$61,628
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$42,837
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Tragic
$50,984
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$106,629
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$111,669
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$66,118
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
27.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 48.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.7%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Fair
82.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.14, a difference of 5.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.9%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 98.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
6.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.4%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
52.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
44.5%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Norway Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Norway
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%