Ecuadorian vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,208,250 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,586, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $102,969, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,306, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,654, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,433, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 56.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 38.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.13%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 224.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 78.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 19.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 47.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 68.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 97.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.6%).