Ecuadorian vs Israeli Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,790,768 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Israelis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Israelis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $52,596, a difference of 25.4%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $118,577, a difference of 24.7%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $63,228, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,335, a difference of 3.0%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $43,852, a difference of 12.1%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $52,937, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.49%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 82.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 76.9%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.1%).