Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Poor
Poor
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,478,566 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 29.6 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,910, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $80,722, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $51,642, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $94,665, a difference of 0.47%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $41,709, a difference of 0.60%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
20.9%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.34%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
15.9%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
80.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 0.87%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Good
30.9%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.9%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.030%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%