Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Denmark
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Denmark

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,985
SOCIAL INDEX
77.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
95th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Denmark Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,150,222 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Denmark.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Denmark Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $53,799, a difference of 28.2%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $120,445, a difference of 26.6%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $64,625, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,612, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $43,646, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $53,186, a difference of 17.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$53,799
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$120,445
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$98,510
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$53,186
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$64,625
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$43,646
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Good
$52,612
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$110,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$116,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$68,801
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
28.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 54.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Excellent
20.5%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.6%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Fair
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Poor
82.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 104.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 39.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Poor
11.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Average
6.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 88.9%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 69.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
53.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Denmark Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Denmark
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%