Ecuadorian vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,655,009 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $49,039, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $59,447, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $44,924, a difference of 0.64%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $80,972, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $42,563, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 47.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 32.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 234.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 66.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 103.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.13%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.0%).