Ecuadorian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,520,492 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $125,312, a difference of 31.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $122,343, a difference of 30.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $119,496, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $58,239, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $46,481, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 54.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 99.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.4%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 2nd grade (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%).