Ecuadorian vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,805,372 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,270, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $104,282, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,109, a difference of 0.020%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,916, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $95,560, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 136.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 69.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.5%).