Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Jordan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Jordan

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,031
SOCIAL INDEX
87.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
33rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Jordan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,077,390 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Jordan.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Jordan Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,041, a difference of 14.7%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $107,715, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,977, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,370, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $97,185, a difference of 6.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Excellent
$45,066
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$107,715
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$89,412
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$48,673
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$57,145
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$40,977
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Poor
$51,370
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Excellent
$97,185
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$106,164
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Excellent
$63,041
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Fair
26.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
83.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 163.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Good
6.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
86.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
67.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
40.3%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Jordan Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Jordan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%