Ecuadorian vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,171,047 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 26.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,940, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,705, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,772, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,477, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,189, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.5%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 199.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 18.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 43.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 55.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 94.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%).