Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Portugal

Poor
Poor
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,859,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 20.9 Immigrants from Portugal.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.6%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $55,182, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $100,984, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,105, a difference of 0.36%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $42,412, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,788, a difference of 1.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Poor
$42,412
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Fair
$100,984
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Average
$84,740
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Good
$47,304
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Good
$55,182
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Average
$39,788
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$54,105
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Good
$95,512
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Fair
$99,203
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$55,924
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
26.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
9.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Average
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Fair
17.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Fair
16.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Poor
17.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
30.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
82.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
45.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
36.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 93.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 32.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
6.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (96.0% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and 7th grade (94.0% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
94.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
93.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
90.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
89.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
85.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
51.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
40.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
32.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Portugal Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Portugal
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%