Ecuadorian vs Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,279,200 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Irish within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 19.8 Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,097, a difference of 11.2%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $105,453, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,291, a difference of 0.44%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,276, a difference of 4.6%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $86,145, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 33.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.9%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.91%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 205.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 54.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 105.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%).