Ecuadorian vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,487,853 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $81,531, a difference of 12.3%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $73,509, a difference of 11.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $37,695, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,029, a difference of 1.7%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $48,402, a difference of 6.6%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $88,717, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.2%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 137.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.2%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.3%).