Ecuadorian vs Danish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Danes

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Danish Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,248,853 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Danes within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Danes.
Ecuadorian Integration in Danish Communities

Ecuadorian vs Danish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 35.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,117, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $105,619, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,041, a difference of 1.6%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,392, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $37,730, a difference of 3.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Income
Income MetricEcuadorianDanish
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Good
$44,095
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Excellent
$105,900
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Excellent
$87,676
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Average
$46,392
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Excellent
$56,246
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$37,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Excellent
$53,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Excellent
$97,221
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$105,619
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$63,117
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
31.0%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 64.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 59.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianDanish
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.0%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.1%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianDanish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.5%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 42.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianDanish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.3%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.1%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianDanish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
51.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 245.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 92.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 75.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianDanish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
93.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
63.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
8.6%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 101.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianDanish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Ecuadorian vs Danish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Danish Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianDanish
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%