Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,029,283 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 24.0%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $109,136, a difference of 14.7%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $59,189, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,488, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $56,503, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $45,622, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 46.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 114.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.75%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).