Ecuadorian vs Pakistani Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,935,276 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Pakistanis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,844, a difference of 16.2%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $107,390, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,325, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,596, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,254, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 42.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.94%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.0%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 153.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 57.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 17.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.5%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.71%).