Ecuadorian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,031,260 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 25.5%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $115,395, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $112,484, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,108, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,991, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 64.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.3%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 169.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 38.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 105.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.2%).