Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Okinawans

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,929,732 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Okinawans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Okinawan Communities

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $129,979, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $124,796, a difference of 33.1%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $55,817, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,701, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $46,905, a difference of 19.9%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
28.1%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 67.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
8.9%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Good
83.0%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
26.9%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 124.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 86.7%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.3%

Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianOkinawan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%