Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Cambodians

Poor
Exceptional
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,243,501 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Cambodians.
Ecuadorian Integration in Cambodian Communities

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $117,780, a difference of 23.8%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $51,731, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $114,342, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,571, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $45,014, a difference of 15.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricEcuadorianCambodian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Average
25.8%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 55.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.54%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianCambodian
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianCambodian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.7%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianCambodian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
26.7%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 108.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.0%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianCambodian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%