Laotian vs Shoshone Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Shoshone
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Shoshone
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Shoshone Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,588,178 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 14.4 Shoshone.
Laotian vs Shoshone Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $83,588, a difference of 32.9%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $72,660, a difference of 30.7%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $87,872, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $48,720, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $34,677, a difference of 21.5%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $37,072 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $87,872 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $72,660 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $40,932 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $47,930 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $34,677 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $48,720 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $82,062 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $83,588 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $53,681 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Good 25.4% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 52.0%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 101.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 54.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 79.3% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.3%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 35.3% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.9%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 66.8%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 83.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 29.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 11.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Laotian vs Shoshone Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.6%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Shoshone |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |