Houma vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,407,684 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 128.5 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 52.0%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $53,681, a difference of 19.8%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $72,660, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,949 compared to $40,932, a difference of 5.1%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $47,930, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $82,062, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 40.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 31.9%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 80.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 55.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.98%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.3%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.4%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 61.7%), ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 12.6%).