Native/Alaskan vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,245,910 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 51.7 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $37,072, a difference of 11.4%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $87,872, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $82,062, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $48,720, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $34,677, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $53,681, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.7%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.3%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and single female poverty (28.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and male unemployment (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (42.8% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.9%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability (14.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.7%).