Scottish vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,595,056 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 33.6 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $83,588, a difference of 22.2%), per capita income ($44,440 compared to $37,072, a difference of 19.9%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $87,872, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $48,720, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $34,677, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $40,932, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.0%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 37.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 66.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 62.5%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.37, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 59.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.3%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.54%), female disability (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.6%).