Chickasaw vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,067,052 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,720, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $82,062, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,681, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,930, a difference of 0.21%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,932, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 47.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 6.4%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.92%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.4%).