Australian vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,046,874 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.359% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 5,359.3 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $37,072, a difference of 40.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $83,588, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $87,872, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $48,720, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $53,681, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 45.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 34.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 77.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 9.2%).