Argentinean vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,704,402 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.886. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 104.8 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $37,072, a difference of 34.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $83,588, a difference of 31.7%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $72,660, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $48,720, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $34,677, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 45.2%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 82.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 60.8%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.72%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 54.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.1%).