Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,889,142 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 87.7 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $83,588, a difference of 26.1%), per capita income ($46,531 compared to $37,072, a difference of 25.5%), and median household income ($90,026 compared to $72,660, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.78%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $48,720, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $53,681, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 49.3%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 54.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.4%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.46%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 53.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.1%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.7%).