Pima vs Shoshone Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Shoshone
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Shoshone
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Shoshone Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,385,528 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 32.5 Shoshone.
Pima vs Shoshone Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,072, a difference of 21.0%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,660, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,062, a difference of 0.92%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,677, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $48,720, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $37,072 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $87,872 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $72,660 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $40,932 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $47,930 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $34,677 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $48,720 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $82,062 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $83,588 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $53,681 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Good 25.4% |
Pima vs Shoshone Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 86.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 82.5%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.3%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 20.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Pima vs Shoshone Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 89.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 78.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Pima vs Shoshone Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 9.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 79.3% |
Pima vs Shoshone Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 45.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 35.3% |
Pima vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Pima vs Shoshone Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 27.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 29.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Shoshone Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.48%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Shoshone |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |