French vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,570,297 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 142.2 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $83,588, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($43,685 compared to $37,072, a difference of 17.8%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $87,872, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $48,720, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $34,677, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $53,681, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.6%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 7.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 61.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.37%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%).