Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,376,346 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $37,072, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $83,588, a difference of 25.6%), and median family income ($108,830 compared to $87,872, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $48,720, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $53,681, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 42.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.4%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 85.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.7%).