French Canadian vs Shoshone Community Comparison
COMPARE
French Canadian
Shoshone
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French Canadians
Shoshone
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Shoshone Integration in French Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,640,822 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.811% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 811.2 Shoshone.
French Canadian vs Shoshone Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $83,588, a difference of 18.5%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $37,072, a difference of 16.0%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $87,872, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $53,681, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $48,720, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.4%).
Income Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,003 | Tragic $37,072 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,634 | Tragic $87,872 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,810 | Tragic $72,660 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,026 | Tragic $40,932 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,722 | Tragic $47,930 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,436 | Tragic $34,677 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,672 | Tragic $48,720 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,694 | Tragic $82,062 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,093 | Tragic $83,588 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,975 | Tragic $53,681 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Good 25.4% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.6%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 6.8%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.6%).
Poverty Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Poor 12.4% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 55.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Tragic 79.3% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.37, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.07 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 35.3% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.9% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.9% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 29.3% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 11.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
French Canadian vs Shoshone Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | French Canadian | Shoshone |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.7% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.0% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |