Latvian vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,787,243 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 149.2 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,072, a difference of 42.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $83,588, a difference of 38.7%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,872, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $48,720, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $53,681, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 54.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 94.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 59.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.37, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 88.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.2%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 10.5%).