Estonian vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,120,467 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.641% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to an increase of 641.4 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,875 compared to $37,072, a difference of 39.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,220 compared to $83,588, a difference of 36.6%), and median family income ($118,013 compared to $87,872, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $48,720, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($43,106 compared to $34,677, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.5%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 44.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 86.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.8%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.9%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.8%).