Immigrants from Fiji vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,904,913 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.172% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 172.1 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 25.0%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $53,154, a difference of 24.5%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $63,939, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,933 compared to $98,008, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $67,626, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $54,389, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.0%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and single father poverty (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.15%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 61.0%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 110.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 69.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%).