Guatemalan vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,599,518 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $53,154, a difference of 40.7%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $63,939, a difference of 36.8%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $120,487, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $54,389, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $44,169, a difference of 23.7%), and wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 62.9%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 107.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 82.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%).