Chickasaw vs Russian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Russian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Russians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Russian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,302,445 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Russians.
Chickasaw vs Russian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $53,154, a difference of 45.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $110,398, a difference of 41.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $116,328, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,389, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $67,626, a difference of 25.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $53,154 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $120,487 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $98,008 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $53,334 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $63,939 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $44,169 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,389 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $110,398 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $116,328 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $67,626 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 47.9%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Average 36.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Fair 54.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 88.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 71.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 53.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 45.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chickasaw vs Russian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Russian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.4% |