Fijian vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,880,456 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 66.4 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $53,154, a difference of 44.9%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $63,939, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $110,398, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,389, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $67,626, a difference of 19.1%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.1%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.8%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 126.1%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 116.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 89.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.8%).