Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,786,076 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 26.5 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $53,154, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $120,487, a difference of 36.5%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $63,939, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $54,389, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $44,169, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 78.9%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 64.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.28%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 6.2%), family households (67.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.12, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 87.8%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 84.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).