New Zealander vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,230,201 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Russians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $53,154, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $110,398, a difference of 5.1%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $120,487, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $67,626, a difference of 0.44%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,389, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.94%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.0%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.63%).