Latvian vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,727,179 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Russians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.410% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 410.3 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,389, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $110,398, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $53,154, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($120,301 compared to $120,487, a difference of 0.15%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $116,328, a difference of 0.32%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $67,626, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.2%), bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and college, under 1 year (71.6% compared to 70.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.33%).